ON THE HOLY LANGUAGE AND THE ETERNITY OF THE MOSAIC LAW
MATTHEW 5:17-20
17 Do not think that I have come to nullify the Law or the Prophets: I have not come to nullify them but to fulfill them.
18 For Amen do I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away not the smallest letter, not a part of a letter, will drop out of the Law until everything written has come to pass.
19 Whoever therefore will nullify one of these “least” commandments and teach men so will be called “least” in the Kingdom of the Heavens; but whoever will perform them and teach them, that one will be called “great” in the Kingdom of the Heavens. 20 For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not even enter the Kingdom of the Heavens.
In truth a powerful but generalized impulse from His Spirit reached the New Testament authors before Revelation, the only inspired book ever dictated word for word, was given as it had those of the Old Testament, even as the Scripture witnesses in I Corinthians 13:8-13, “Love will have no end. But whether there are prophecies, they will be done away with; or tongues, they will cease; or knowledge, it will be done away with; because we know partially and we prophesy partially. When that which is perfect comes, however, that which is partial will be done away with. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I did away with childish things. For now we see things enigmatically through a looking glass; but then face to face. I know now partially; but then I will know fully, just as I am fully known. So there remain faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love”; and as this issue is analyzed at some length elsewhere, and so they quoted or paraphrased the Septuagint, which was the recension of the Old Testament known to Greek speakers, and they writing in Greek to fulfill Isaiah 28:11-12, “For through foreign speech and another tongue will He speak to this people, to whom He shall say, ‘This is the rest through which you may cause the weary one to rest, and this is the respite,’ but they will have no desire to listen,” and so that the completed Scripture would be multilingual as a sign that its message is not intended only for some particular nation or language or culture and that indeed no one of these can claim preeminence over any other, though it is Hebrew, the language of nearly four-fifths of the Scripture, and it came spontaneously to Adam and cannot be other than the speech of the gods and the speech of angels — Amen! Hallelujah! (surely He came with the flesh of Heaven into this world which is His dream) — a purely Biblical tongue and with the now imminent final vengeance against the Judaic the tongue of no modern group — truly this so-called Jew has shown in Palestine the truth of every last single “canard” of the most rabid “anti-Semitism”: behold, O world, the Jew! — being rather that of the eastern portion of the Central African forest belt called Eden, “region of delight,” where the Garden and Adam were, even by the headwaters of the Nile and the Uele-Ubangi-Zaire — and surely the color of the African alone is similar to that of “the dust of the ground” from which the man was formed, the reference to the Tigris and the Euphrates serving merely to universalize certain elements of the narrative; and see in Genesis 10:7 how there was a Cushitic Havilah — whose people and speech the holy family brought with them from the presence of the Lord out of Africa to Nod, the land of wandering, even Arabia to the east of Eden — this of course while other groups were also moving into the region from the north, these of the great Indus Valley civilization that built no temples, Arpachshad, “Harappa the destroyed,” the latter portion of whose name evidently survived as Kesed (Chaldea) in the wilderness area back of Ur, and Shelah, “the sent forth one,” also mighty long-necked giants of the seed of Anak, “the long-necked one,” from the shores of the Baltic (and the first Greek speakers c. 2000 B.C. came also from the Baltic region, and so the language of the New Testament represents the first form of Northern speech ever committed to writing — and the mantle of the ancient Germanic is borne by the modern German, as established elsewhere), and so the mixed-race or Arabic stock including ultimately the children of Israel arose, as in 6:1-3, whose emergence, though not the violence of the rulers of in particular Mesopotamia of the day, of whom the Scripture says in Jude 6, “And as for those rulers who kept no rule over themselves — but they certainly have left their estates behind them! He keeps them in eternal bonds under gloom for the judgment of the great day”; and read “rulers” in II Peter 2:4 as well; and see Psalm 49:11 and 73:18-19; reminded the Lord of the coming of the prophet Moses who was to take a Nubian wife, as in Numbers 12 (and compare Deuteronomy 24:8-9; also Leviticus 13:1-46; and see how the leprosy spoken of in the Scripture was no random occurrence, but a supernaturally induced chastisement for racist feeling, the offenders being stricken in accord with the predominant conceit of the racists of Israel, who sought identification with those of white skin and thin yellow hair and despised the African — but truly the Scripture says in Isaiah 18:7 speaking of the black man in America and his role in our liberation of ancestral homelands program, as discussed elsewhere, “At that time an offering will be brought to the LORD of hosts from a people scattered and become plunder, and from a people whose history has been fearful from of old, a nation meted out and trodden under foot, who were taken as spoil down the rivers of their land, to the place of the Name of the LORD of hosts, the mount of Zion,” and
we certainly must affirm as a theological construct and aspect of dogma that the Afro-American is no longer in regard to
1
essential nature as of the Hamitic stock at all, but rather entirely of the Japhetic, and perhaps even, in response to a subliminal “sighting” of the parameters of the British mind and the climate of North America under the conditions of extreme psychic trauma of past times, on the basis of genetic modification, so that he represents in evolutionary terms a new emergence in inward if, due to the effects of narcotics and the despondency-fury syndrome in which their appeal is rooted, itself the child of white scorn and rejection and the insidious two-faced maneuverings of the Judaic, however veiled conformity with the European rather than the African norm), and He said, “My Spirit will not have to strive against man forever, for that one will also be of flesh: and his days will be 120 years,” where “be of flesh” has the sense of our “have human feelings”; and compare Deuteronomy 34:7; and surely the appearance of a world-nationality formed by the amalgamation and blending of the peoples and ethnic stocks through intermarriage, the only form of mankind capable of being produced by human action, is manifestly both the sign of the ultimate flowering and the fruit of peace and love; and the Scripture testifies in Isaiah 49:12, “Behold, these will come from far off; and behold, these from the north and from the west; and these from the land of China” — though its original purity was ultimately lost save only among the Israelites, and truly its script and not the Phoenician is the parent form of all phonetic scripts that exist in the world, and even the Devanagari of Sanskrit descends from it, and it was the Lord’s gift to Cain, city-builder and father of civilizers, for see how “the LORD gave the alphabet to Cain as assurance that none who found him would smite him” in Genesis 4:15, that will serve as the holy and pure vehicle for world linguistic unification, and as per Zephaniah 3:9, “For I will give the peoples a pure language then, that they might all call on the Name of the LORD and serve Him in perfect unity” — and with Hebrew as the common speech of all mankind the full rigor of Old Testament law, though it is not incumbent in an absolute or ultimate sense and the ancients were forced to remove themselves far from it, will surely nonetheless return, and as per Matthew 5:17-20 and 28:18-20; and compare Ephesians 3:8; Acts 9:15-16; I Corinthians 9:16-17; II Corinthians 12:7; also the panegyric to the Law which is the 119th Psalm; and even circumcision is a shadow of His blessed reality, and sacrifice and offering on altars of earth: for we were grafted in, but the chosen ethnics were cast off and driven from the world, and then we were alone the remnant of Israel and the sole surviving vestige of the people of the Jews; and in truth, “it pleases the LORD for the sake of His righteousness, that He magnify the Law and aggrandize it,” as in Isaiah 42:21 (but see how first forms have precedence in all things, as per Matthew 19:8 and Mark 10:5-6, and how we are to search for underlying principles, as per Mark 2:27-28; and the appearance of the God among us in the person of the blessed Jesus as a type and figure of the world’s poor in the hands of the children of the evil one foretold, though in cryptic manner, in Zechariah 11:4-17, does illustrate this supremacy of first forms, for note the lower class focus of the section, and how, having referred symbolically to the cutting off of Saul and his two wicked sons Abinadab and Malchishua, the king and the kingdom the Lord had not wanted but had grudgingly consented to, at the perhaps month-long campaign culminating in Israelite defeat at Mount Gilboa, the great slaughter among the host, as in I Samuel 31:2, 5-6, the supplantation by the Philistines, who had come from beyond the sea to establish a coastal enclave, of the Israelites of the distant Jezreel Valley-Jordan River salient, type of the alien and usurping Judaics in modern Palestine, as in verse 7 — and note the two-tiered nature of Philistine society, that is, the thoroughly Canaanized but ethnically European, as is now known, ruling Cretan, as the Scripture says conformable to this in Genesis 10:14, “and (being of the same place the Philistines went forth from) the Cretans,” and the subservient true Canaanite, and as per Zephaniah 2:5, strata, likeness of the ethnically European Khazar and the Semitic, though also non-Jewish, Sephardic elements of the hosts of the oppressor, and the name of their king of Gath in the days of Saul and David, Achish son of Maoch, as in I Samuel 27:2, meaning “Certainly this is a person,” son of “the Oppressed,” being so much in accord with the Ever-Wronged-Perpetual-Victim image cultivated ad nauseam by the Judaic — and the following civil war between the house of David and the house of Saul when David was king in Hebron, but then the building of the Solomonic Temple, yet one more step after the institution of monarchy on the path of civilization and away from the barbarian life of earlier and better days, and an expensive one and one involving great exactions and grinding of the face of the poor — and see even see in I Kings 10:14 and II Chronicles 9:13 how it was 666 talents of gold that came to Solomon in one year — but with such features as cannot be applied to this project, seemingly approved of, but as before grudgingly, by the Lord, alone, as the Scripture says here, “thirty pieces of silver,” this being the price of a gored slave, as per Exodus 21:32, and then, “throw it at the molder,” and then mockingly, “a majestic price it was that I was evaluated at by them,” all this followed, and even causally, by the North-South division of the kingdom, true likeness of the fruit of the bitterness engendered by Herod the Great, and then an event clearly future from Zechariah's time, which can be none other than the reign of this same wicked Herod who rebuilt the existing Second Temple lavishly and at great cost and in whose days the Lord appeared among us as a peasant, was bought and sold for the price of a gored slave, and as He had said above, but now in accordance with the fullness of its meaning, “a majestic price it was that I was evaluated at by them,” and so became a type in all respects of the fate of the children of His true Kingdom in the hands of the wealthy and the rulers of the lands — and Himself a peasant turned insurgent in the Middle East of His other world — only leaving us over the guidance of His self-validating Scripture and the gift of His Holy Spirit; and here is Jeroboam the son of Nebat and the son of a widow woman, a laborer, who fled to Egypt and returned, whom my Lord incited to rebellion through His prophet Ahijah the Shilonte and the
distinctive garment that was upon him, of whom no evil is spoken until he is established in his kingdom, a figure of Christ and a figure of antichrist, and even as is Joseph, as shown to be so elsewhere; and there is a wait of three days, and a day can represent a century, as in Revelation 2:10; 11:9 and 11, as discussed also elsewhere, and this wait would bring us to the reign of Constantine the Great, king of Rome, and the legitimization by the Roman state of that form of Christianity, being the Roman Catholic, patently prefigured by the heretical and idolatrous distortion of the Mosaic faith sponsored by Jeroboam at the
2
time of his fall, for an “Oral Law”-“oral tradition” that he had devised out of his own heart, he and his counsellors, clearly lay behind the inversion of the sense of the Pentateuchal golden calf narrative, his veneration of images, modification of Pentateuchal ceremonial elements, illegitimate building of shrines on high places, reminiscent of the cathedrals — surely He spurns the temples made by hands — and the institution of a new priesthood in violation of the Lord’s express will; and there was in this latter period none good in the whole house of Jeroboam except for one child, who was taken away before his time, and of whom the prophet Ahijah testified that “some good thing” was found in him, and this child must surely represent Protestantism as classically constituted and, although all names in the Jeroboam narrative, being I Kings 11:26-14:20; 15:25-32, are resplendent with symbolic import, yet this child’s name is among them, being Abijah, which is “the Lord is my father,” which can be understood as implying “my father alone,” that is, to the exclusion of the “little father” or Pope and the Catholic clergy as a whole, and as per Christ’s own commandment and true sign of Matthew 23:9; and Nadab, meaning “liberal,” represents an altered latter-day form of Catholicism of short duration, which traipses about through the lands and so at last comes to its end; and Ahijah the Shilonite had said that the kingdom would under any circumstances ultimately return to the house of David, and the prophet who came from Judah said that Jeroboam’s heresy would be undone by Josiah king of Judah to be born, and both prophecies were fulfilled through Josiah, who expanded Judean sovereignty to include the waste and desolate North, and who as a king of the house of David surely represents the first form of this context, which is the Mosaic Law; but as Jeroboam was clearly appointed by the Lord and through His prophet, true figure of John the Baptist, Josiah, whose name means “established” or “founded by the Lord,” represents the undoing of the universal composite antichrist in its entirety through the agency of the restored true church of these last days of Babylon’s world rule, and partly through her accepting and emphasizing the first form of this our present context, which is this same Mosaic Law; and see further from Leviticus 10 and the stonings of the Law, as also the typology of both Leviticus 16 and the placement of the Tabernacle furnishings — may he who reads this understand — with what clarity and flawlessness, lacking all distortion, the prophet verbalized each and every legislative element; and the Scripture witnesses in Psalm 19:8, “the commandments of the LORD are clear, causing the eyes to light up”), for although the artificial dichotomy between an old and a new Law established through the antinomianism of Paul was a truly essential factor in permitting the flame of truth to spring from wick to wick and even as was the very employment of the Greek tongue, yet it is in the last analysis to be equated with the seemingly ethnic focus of the Old Testament latter-day prophecies, and as discussed elsewhere, and so all has become as a fiery serpent that holds its tail in its mouth, for the culmination and capstone of the divine process and the coursing of the mystic river whose streams bear joy for the believers and the city of our God is the entering of all the world’s people and that to the fullest extent into Israelite nationality, though “our citizenship is in Heaven,” as in Philipians 3:20, and the core ethnic element has fallen out in its entirety ages past, even as the acquisition and conception of American nationality of this time (though we state quite openly that the only further immigration required for the performance of the American world role, and as discussed at some length elsewhere, is Haitian, now that the Lord, intending to further the cause of Hebrew, has already gathered a multitude of Hispanics to this land, that we might cull from the hearts of those who love us the forgotten ways and mind-set of Africa, truly past even Jerusalem the mother of us all, fulfilling thereby the word of the prophet, “From beyond the rivers of Nubia my suppliants, even the daughter of My dispersed, will bring My offering,” as in Zephaniah 3:10, we who cannot forget the millions whose blood the earth itself refuses to cover, who died in battle and in famine houses and slaughter pits and in sudden belching infernos opening out under British and Soviet planes, and there was a war-hymn in that day in the mouth of all that no one paid the least heed to but our Lord, and it was “We are Biafrans fighting for survival — by the Name of Jesus we shall conquer!”) which may be likened to nothing but the religionist conversion experience in all the wide range of human ken; and compare Deuteronomy 29:29; and see how James presupposes the application of the divine Law to the Christian (and the nature of the prophecies of James, extending as they do to the end of all time, establishes plainly that it is ourselves, all of us — that is, the poor — who are in truth these “twelve tribes which are scattered abroad” of James 1:1), “the whole Law” (2:10), “the perfect Law that gives freedom” (1:25; and see also 2:12), in his discussion of faith and works (1:16-17, 25; 2:8-25; 4:11-12; and compare Malachi 3:6, “For I, the LORD, do not change: and shall you children of Jacob not be consumed?” and in truth He is this Jesus Christ whom we preach, “the same yesterday, today, and forever,” of Hebrews 13:8), even as he emphasizes Leviticus 19:18 and the commandments governing interpersonal relations; and truly “the Law of the LORD is perfect, restoring the spirit” (Psalm 19:7); for how important it is to keep the entire Law, says James, and not to offend in even one particular, and it is Leviticus 19:18 that is under discussion, through which the royal Law, the Law of the King of Heaven and earth (2:8), gives freedom; and he condemns speaking evil of the Law or judging the Law by breaking it, but counsels that we are rather to keep it, and that there is only one Lawgiver, and we are not fellow lawgivers along with Him (4:11-12) — then blessed be His glorious Name forever, and blessed be the remembrance of His perfect Law; and the book of
Malachi with which the Old Testament closes, having just prophesied the destruction through fire of the Soviet state and the extermination of the residual world Marxist collectivity to follow in 2:17 and 3:13-4:3, concludes by referring again to the coming of John the Baptist, “the messenger of the covenant,” whose coming followed by that of the Lord had been prophesied above in 3:1-6, saying that all who are called by the name Israel are to remember and perform the Law of Moses with its statutes and judgments, and the Scripture here connects the adjuration regarding the Law to not only John’s coming but the time of eschatological vengeance, “the coming of the great and fearful day of the LORD,” as well; and the blessed Jesus came after John and did Himself counsel us to keep this same Law with these very statutes and judgments that He had Himself given
3
and did Himself punctiliously observe the whole time He walked among us — He is Lord of all — through His prophet Moses; and how blessed even now “are the undefiled in the Way, who walk in the Law of the LORD” (Psalm 119:1); and these live most fully and in essence within the narratives and the whole life of the Bible, which is the window looking out on the Hidden World and the abode of truth and joy, from which they sally forth as agents of Heaven, as though to destroy the Judaic out of Palestine or the Marxist from the ends of the earth, to reconnoiter or to strike in this exterior lower world; and so the Scripture says in Proverbs 18:10, “The Name of the LORD is a tower of strength: the righteous one runs into it and is inaccessible”; and there is in the Bible scattered throughout both the Old and New Testaments the greatest poetry the world has ever seen, as we of the English literary tradition well may judge, though of a type reminiscent of Beowulf and other works of the ancient North, whose beauty and power are retained even in translation, being extrinsic to the precise phraseology in the original tongue; and see how true and faithful are the words of the prophet David in Psalm 119:174, “I have longed for Your salvation, O LORD, and Your Law is my delight”; and that we are Israelites, as though by fleshly descent, and the ancients are reckoned as our fathers, all of them, is plain, for see Romans 9:10; I Corinthians 10:1; James 2:21; and I Peter 3:6; and compare Romans 1:13; 11:13; and I Corinthians 12:2; and a pure and holy form of nationalism, Hebrew in thought and speech, Christian as it is Mosaic, will surely sprout forth among us in that day, handmaiden to the supernatural, one that will despise “all who wear foreign garb” (Zephaniah 1:8) among the people, but yet one that could never act in accord with the false and evil secular nationalistic zeal of Saul, as the Scripture testifies, “Now the Gibeonites were not of the children of Israel, but of the remnant of the Amorites, and the children of Israel had sworn to them; but Saul had sought to slay them in his zeal for the children of Israel and Judah” (II Samuel 21:2); and see how Paul, witnessing to men of Europe, even those of Corinth, reminds them not of the Jewish but specifically the Arabic, that is mixed-race, appearance and origin of the blessed Jesus, for first he says, “If anyone does not love the Lord, let him be accursed,” and that in Greek, but then “Marana tha!” “Come, O our Lord!” not in Greek and not in Hebrew, but rather in Aramaic, the Semitic lingua franca of that time (I Corinthians 16:22; and compare 12:2); and even as he wrote to the Romans, “You stand only through the Faith. Do not become highminded, but rather be in fear: for if God did not spare the natural branches, how is it possible for Him to fail not to spare you?” (Romans 11:20-21; and see 11:13; also 1:13); so that the same fate precisely that overtook the ancient Jews now awaits an apostate Europe — save only the Germans, and as discussed at length elsewhere, they of perseverance and fanatical determination, given to mysticism, ever predictable and without guile — and even as the Lord said through His prophet Amos, “You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will visit all your iniquities upon you” (Amos 3:2); and truly He confounded their language, as the language of Babylon, for their heresy, though today that seems mild, proto-antichrist turned antichrist, likeness of the ziggurat, and He still remembers their most ancient sins and when He died among them — truly He came down from Heaven to the earth to see them in their evil — and will surely yet scatter them abroad, a few here, a few there, upon the face of all the earth, for now they are worthy (Genesis 11:1-9; and compare 9:1 and 1:28; also 15:16, and further Revelation 9:20-21); and the many instances of that well-nigh inexplicable stiff-necked rebelliousness that crowd the pages of the Pentateuch, the initial and foundational unit of Scripture, cannot but indicate to the impartial reader that its divine Author is here preparing him for a later episode in which He will sever His connection with fleshly Israel, and to such an extent that His statement in anger to Moses, “And now let Me be, that My anger might burn against them and consume them; and I will make of you a great nation” of Exodus 32:10, and as paralleled in Deuteronomy 9:14, “Let Me be, that I might destroy them and blot out their name from under heaven; and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they,” and then repeated in Numbers 14:12, “I will smite them with the pestilence and disinherit them, and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they” (and there in 14:21 He said, “But truly as I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD”; and compare Psalm 72:19, and even as this entire psalm is applied elsewhere to the Christian corporative theocracy and the person of the Lord’s king destined to supplant our manifestly counterproductive individualistic-Enlightenment state form), must be viewed simply as a revelation of His ultimate purpose with regard to the peculiar chosens and the passing of the divine guidance from them to a far wider group through the conduit of a small remnant element destined itself for loss of ethnicity through intermarriage, for “these are the ones who were not defiled with women, for they have not known sex” (Revelation 14:4; and see how “the son of the foreigner who has joined himself to the LORD” is compared to the eunuch in Isaiah 56:1-9, for “he of a strange people,” if male but neither Edomite before the days of Edomite treachery nor Egyptian, could “never enter the congregation of the LORD forever,” as per Deuteronomy 23:2-8, and compare the sole further appearance of this underlying Hebrew word in Zechariah 9:6), with the main group first disinherited and then driven from the world (truly the prophet Moses, though received into glory having left his body, even the community grounded in the fullness of truth of his Law, under the rule of Michael and prohibited forever to the devil, as in Jude 9 and Zechariah 3:1-2, was denied entrance to the promised land and died at its border in the wilderness only as a sign of the fate of fleshly Israel, that it was to be consumed and pass from the world and never return out of exile again; and even as the entire desert narrative prefigures this — the giving of the holy Law, the sin and casting off of the people, their wandering long and hard years, as in Deuteronomy 2:15, awaiting an appointed death, and the inheritance by a successor group of the divine blessings and promises; and see the character of the first sons of Jacob as displayed in their dealings with their brother Joseph, that it is of a piece with that of the Israelites of all ages, as both the Law and the Prophets no less than the Gospel bear witness, so that we see plainly how a nation was raised up characterized by an innate depravity, though often neutralized by the witness of open miracles, chosen to be jettisonable at a time of universalization to come; and note as well how all significant Israelite firsts are rejected, and these are seven firsts, so that the
4
concept of ultimate rejection is connected from the beginning and in essence with the name of fleshly Israel, for the firstborn son of Abraham is rejected, as is the firstborn son of Isaac, and then Reuben, firtborn son of Jacob, is rejected for Joseph, whose firstborn, Manasseh, is rejected, and Joseph is rejected from rulership in favor of Benjamin in the person of Saul, who is himself rejected for a man of Judah, and Judah too is well-nigh rejected and never rules over the North again); and the prophet’s first wife Zipporah displayed a progressivist-elitist bent of mind in regard to the circumcision (Exodus 4:24-26), and is a manifest figure of “Christian” Europe — and Moses divorced her but received her back again for the sake of Jethro her father, true figure of Germany, and his own two sons by her (Exodus 18) — but his Nubian second wife, a manifest figure of the peasant lands and the collectivity of the world elect, was well-pleasing in every way to both the prophet and the Lord, who defended her honor both through word and deed, for the orientation of the Lord Himself has always been entirely toward the life-bearing doctrine destined to liberate the entire household of the children of His Kingdom even as from the dead and the power of the grave (Romans 11:15; Ezekiel 37:1-14), and not at all toward intermediary communities through whose agency the holy seed and leaven were strewn abroad from Palestine to every region under heaven; and our Lord compares Himself to the prophet Jonah in Matthew 12:39, saying, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and no sign will be given to it but the sign of the prophet Jonah”; and his name means “dove”: and even as the Holy Spirit descended in bodily form as a dove upon Jesus, as per Luke 3:22, so is Jonah a figure for the Lord Himself who descended from Heaven in bodily form among us; and the prophet Jonah was from Gath-hepher (II Kings 14:25), which occupied the same small Galilean hill as the later Nazareth, and he went down from there to Joppa, and Peter son of Jonah was called from Joppa to bring the light of Christ to the Gentiles (Acts 10:30-33), and he boards a ship and moves west across the Sea, intending to land at Tarshish, which is Spain, as did Paul (Romans 15:24, 28), but is met by the fierce Euraquilo (Acts 27:14), and converts on the ship men the likeness of men of the West and says (Jonah 2:8), “Those who regard lying vanities will forsake their perversions,” and Euraquilo means “South-east, north,” and the first part is in Greek and the second in Latin, and the storm from out of Arabia destroyed Greek Christendom and the so-called Enlightenment then decimated Europe; and he is thrown as though to his death in the West, but escapes through a miracle and lives to witness with great success among the people of the East, people of the Third World, and even as the book of Jonah ends, saying in 4:11, “And as for Myself, should I not have pity on Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than twelve multitudes of people who cannot distinguish between their right and left hands, and also much cattle?” which can only mean, “See how receptive these people are, though I never before this sent them prophets, and they cause Me no trouble like the twelve tribes of your people. And even their cattle cause Me no trouble, but your people are a seed of evildoers and hostile to all men — and woe betide the non-Jew who falls under their power!” (but yet the book of Job, the Bible’s sole and exclusive work of theological disputation, all of whose participants were Gentile, must represent typologically the dialogue to arise between the Old and New Testaments and the Koran, with Job representing the perfect Law under chastisement and disrepute though without flaw, his three friends who, though essentially positive, condemn him without knowledge, but are rendered acceptable to God through Job’s mediation, both Job and Eliphaz, chiefest and master of the group of three, being rendered, further, prophets at the end, though the divine word had come to both earlier, as may be seen from Job 4:12-21 and 6:10, and even as his own captivity is returned only when he prays for these his friends, the New Testament and historic Christianity, and the negative and even hostile Elihu, whose name means “God is He” and is numerically equivalent to Ahmad, Muhammad’s original name, having the value of 53, the text of the Koran; and this is the “twice, three times” of Job 33:29 of Elihu’s discourse, Old Testament, New Testament, Koran, and the reason for the “a messenger with him, an interpreter, one among a thousand” element of verse 23, God having already spoken once, then twice, but man remaining unaware, as in verse 14, prefiguring, though Elihu himself was unaware, the Islamic position of the distant future; but see the succession of true prophets prefigured by the vision of the ladder of Genesis 28:10-13 where angels, the same word in both Hebrew and Greek as for messengers, ascend and descend between Heaven and earth for Jacob, followed by the standing of the Lord Himself, that is to say, in incarnate form, by him at the end; and a new succession of Christ as God incarnate oriented prophets was to be sent again, Jacob now representing the Lord’s other earthly body, that is, His elect, as per John 1:47-51; and the Lord appeared to Job in incarnate form as well in Job 40:1-5 between His two addresses to him from the whirlwind, for he says thereafter in 42:5, “I heard You by the hearing of the ear; but now my eye has seen You”; and being a true prophet, he speaks in 19:25-27 of Jesus, and as a type of all Old Testament Christology; but Elihu, though there is reflected good in his words culled from his knowledge of the divine Law, is utterly ignored and bypassed at the time of reconciliation; and see from any map of Arabia showing the ancient place-names how the invader of Isaiah 21:11-17 is to sweep northward from the interior, overwhelming Dedan, Tema, Dumah, Seir, which is Edom, and then presumably Palestine, the locale of the prophet, in rapid succession; and the Scripture witnesses in verse 12, saying, “the morning comes, and also the night,” and the morning is the revelation of the Gospel, and the night is this Islam to arise south of Dedan; and what an amazing and befitting thing it is, how our Scripture alone in all the world confesses and emphasizes the self-evident relevancy of supernatural proof from beginning to end, that is, from the commissioning of Moses to the highly complex and largely already fulfilled, as established in detail elsewhere, prophecies of the book of Revelation; and let it not be forgotten that the teachers of Muhammad were Judaics, drawn to Judaism through the conversion of the Yemenite royal house of Himyar, called today Sephardics, and not true Jews of the Biblical people, as is slanderously reported, and even as those of European blood descend from the early Medieval Khazars of the Ukraine) and the Scripture witnesses plainly in regard to the ministry of the prophet Moses in Deuteronomy 34:5-12, “So Moses the servant of the LORD died there in the land of Moab according to the
5
word of the LORD. And He buried him in the valley in the land of Moab that faces Beth Peor so that no man would know the location of his grave until that day. And Moses was 120 years old at his death; his vision had not weakened and his vigor had not left him. And the children of Israel are to weep for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then are the days of weeping and mourning for Moses to be at an end. And Joshua the son of Nun has become filled with the Spirit of wisdom, because Moses placed his hands on him; the children of Israel are to hearken to him therefore: so are they to do, even as the LORD commanded Moses. And a prophet like Moses whom the LORD knew face to face will not arise again in Israel, according to all the signs and the wonders that the LORD sent him to perform in the land of Egypt against Pharaoh and against all his servants and against his entire land, and according to all the mighty hand and according to all the great terror that Moses displayed in the sight of all Israel”; and see 31:24; also 32:39; and then further in 33:2-5, “The LORD came from Sinai and flashed forth from Seir for them; He shone forth from the mountains of Paran, and came for the myriad disciples of holiness; from His right hand went a decree of fire for them: Certainly He loves the peoples — all His holy ones will be in your hand; and they will sit themselves down at your feet, each one of them receiving of your words and saying, ‘Moses commanded the Law for us, even the heritage of the congregation of Jacob: for he became king among the Upright when the heads of that people and the tribes of Israel gathered themselves to him’ ”; and even as the ultimate universalization of the Law was prefigured at the very beginning of the Wilderness period in Exodus 15:22-27 at the encampments of Marah and Elim, meaning “Bitterness” and “Great Trees,” respectively, for the twelve founts and seventy palm trees of the latter site must surely represent the twelve tribes of Israel and the seventy nations of the Biblical region of Genesis 10, which latter may be seen to represent all nations in Deuteronomy 32:7-9, so that the water of the founts gives life to the trees and therefore represents divine revelation given to all mankind through the medium of ancient Israel; and thus the waters of Marah were first bitter, symbolizing the initial ethnic focus of the Biblical revelation, but are sweetened by the casting into them of a tree, symbolizing the Gentiles, that is, the universalization of the Law through Christ, also His very cross, called “tree” in, for instance, Acts 5:30; at which point, that is, in Exodus 15:26, where the future calling and healing of the Gentiles is surely implied as well, the Israelites are warned severely of the fruits of disobedience; and compare the 19th Psalm, noting how the sun there is a figure of the Law and how it was to proceed forth from ancient Palestine to all the extremities of the world; also the 111th Psalm, only that “the heritage of the heathen” is great Babylon at her fall; and even as “the high places of the earth” of Isaiah 58:13-14, “If you cause your feet to return home because of the Sabbath, not acting in accord with your desires on My holy day, and if you call the Sabbath a delight and the holy day of the LORD honorable, and will honor Him by not acting in accord with your own ways, or seeking the fulfillment of your own desires, or even speaking on it so much as a word of them; then you will find delight in the LORD, and I will cause you to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed you with the heritage of Jacob your father: for the mouth of the LORD has spoken it”; and the very process of the creation of the world served to foreshadow and introduce the Saturday Sabbath (Genesis 2:1-3; Exodus 20:8-11; 31:12-17; and also 16:23, 29 and 35:3); and see the palm fronds of Tabernacles in the hands of the redeemed, as per Revelation 7:9, knowing that the branches of John 12:13 were for spreading out on the road; and compare Leviticus 23:40; and even in accord with the fullness of meaning implicit in the phrase "the song of Moses the servant of God and the song of the Lamb” of Revelation 15:3; and one verse says, “he will think to change times and laws” (Daniel 7:25), and a second, “Here is the root of the perseverance of the saints, who keep the commandments of God and the Faith of Jesus” (Revelation 14:12); and compare Isaiah 66:17; and see further how the 144,000 Jewish Christians (Revelation 7:1-8; 14:1-5 — note how the list of tribes is defective, for Dan is not mentioned, and is thus symbolic of fleshly Israel as actually constituted during the New Testament age, that is almost entirely of descendants of the old-time Southern Kingdom, but comparable spiritually to the Danites when the graven image of Micah was set up among them, as in Judges 18:30-31, and destined like them to pass from the world) of whom it is said that “falsehood was not found in their mouth, for they are without flaw” and “It is these who follow the Lamb wherever He might go” are praised above all men for full comprehension of the import of the new teaching; but truly they were distinct from other Christians only in regard to their zeal for the divine Law (Acts 21:20; 22:12; and compare Matthew 24:20), so that we must affirm that the inner veiled essence of Paul's antinomian assertions finds its proper application in these last days only in reference to his own words (surely just as
the Lord gave true prophecy to Balaam, but he remained in his evil and is called a diviner still at his death in Joshua 13:22, so did Paul, inquisitor and tyrant, though made the Lord’s true prophet, yet remain forever in his reprobate state, a rat forced to eat itself, over the edge, falling toward the fire) — but the Masoretic, which is surely to be identified with the real Jews of ancient times rather than the spurious variety of the modern Synagogue of Satan, though the latter has fastened itself securely to it as though to bring it into disrepute and drag it down to oblivion, being a manifestly superior form of text on the basis of overall character, sequence of material, internal consistency, lack of artificial elements and that aura of unreality observable at times in the Septuagint as in the Apochrypha, and one preserved among a peasant people conversant with its language and one of zeal to whom the oracles had been first entrusted, coupled with the evident fulfillment of its form of the predictive content of the Old Testament during the course of subsequent history as all may plainly see, must be adjudged the original and may in truth be compared to a living man, but the Septuagint to a clay image (Luke 4:16-22; Romans 10:2; 3:2); and we must affirm that the original text has been preserved unchanged or virtually so in one of the existing forms and that one surely in Hebrew [but the mystic significance adhering to the precise wording and spelling of that almost four-fifths of the Bible given in the holy language or its script is in truth the seal of the great King affirming that the entire Old Testament has truly been preserved in an absolutely flawless letter-perfect state; and “it is easier for the heaven and the earth to pass away than for one
6
part of a letter to fall out of the Law,” as per Luke 16:17; and see Matthew 5:18; and compare Revelation 13:18 and as analyzed elsewhere; and further, the very essence and life-force of all which exists in the world is borne by its name in the speech of the gods, for word-formation precedes image-formation, as is known, in the thought of all who use speech; and compare Revelation 9:11; but yet see how the entire Scripture lives, as per Acts 7:38; Hebrews 4:12; and I Peter 1:23; and that it is the very divine life that is truly in it, as it is an emanation of His blessed will and essence given through His Holy Spirit, very much comparable as such to His appearance here in and as Christ (John 1:18; II Corinthians 3:17)] — and the Old Testament Israelites were clearly literate to a degree unparalleled in the ancient world, for in regard to one taken at random by Gideon the Scripture witnesses in Judges 8:14, “And he captured a young man of the men of Succoth and questioned him; and he wrote down the names of the princes of Succoth and its elders for him, seventy-seven men”; and compare Isaiah 10:19; and this is only in accord with what had been enjoined previously in Deuteronomy 6:6-9 through Moses, “And these words that I am commanding you this day are to be in your heart. And teach them diligently to your children and speak of them when you sit in your house and when you go in the road and when you lie down and when you rise up. And bind them together for a sign in your hand that they might be held at eye level for recitation. And copy them out within your gates by the doorposts of your house”; and the holy book subsequently expanded in length, for “Joshua wrote these words in the book of the Law of God,” as in Joshua 24:26; and compare Isaiah 34:16; John 10:34; 12:34; 15:25; Romans 3:9-19; and I Corinthians 14:21; and truly the Spirit has always guided the chosen community, first Israelite and then Christian, in the acceptance of divinely given units of Scripture and the rejection of all that is spurious, and even in accord with the witness of Ezekiel 13:9, “And My hand will be against the prophets who see vanity and who divine lies: their words will not appear within the source of counsel of My people, for they will not be written in the Scripture of the house of Israel; neither will they themselves enter the land of Israel; and then you will know that I am the Lord GOD,” so that the Bible expands in this world only after the type of that primordial form of its text, canon and wording, to be found in Heaven spoken of by the angel in Daniel 10:21, “But I will declare to you that which is inscribed in the Scripture of truth”; and see how the Pentateuch through its structure — introduction, main body, inspired commentary — looks forward to and validates the completed Scripture — Law, Prophets, Gospel — and in particular its view of the New Testament as in essence an inspired commentary on all that came before; but yet the first two divisions more readily divide from Deuteronomy than from each other, prefiguring together the Old Testament; and as Genesis and Deuteronomy are comparatively short within the Law, each being one of five, so are the Law and the New Testament within the Bible; and there truly were forty years between the standing of Israel by mount Sinai and the giving of the book of Deuteronomy only as a sign of the coming of a four hundred-year-long intertestamental age, this extending from c.358 B.C., the last year of Artaxerxes II Mnemon king of Persia, the probable date of the sending of the text of Malachi through the agency of the translated Elijah to us from Heaven, and as discussed elsewhere, perhaps during the governorship of Nehemiah’s successor, the likely Persian Bagohi, as per Malachi 1:8 and the Elephantine Papyri, and 41 A.D., or thereabouts, following traditional indications as to the date of the writing of Matthew, viewed since ancient times as the first gospel; and grosser forms of heresy were to be banished from the hearts of the men of the intertestamental age through the cessation of prophecy and the attendant longing for its reemergence and consequent great turning toward and acquisition by or strengthening of a traditionalist aura of the written words of former prophets, as per Amos 8:11-14, and so it was then, and even as it came to be during the course of the full generation, likeness of that earlier age, that is from c.65 A.D. to 98, that elapsed between the giving of the last of all other New Testament books and that of the book of Revelation, the perfection of knowledge and prophecy; and see further how it was to be restored yet again through the prophets John of Leyden and Bernard of Munster, as discussed at length elsewhere, as per Revelation 10:11-11:14, also the announcer-prophets of Zwickau, likeness of John the Baptist, and then in the giving by one in the form of a nuclear explosion of that booklet of 10:1-10, sealed up and hidden from men, though John heard it recited verbatim and it entered fully into his being, until the seventh angel would be about to sound his trumpet, which is even the latter-day, post-Christian, ages of darkness “eyes” element of Isaiah 29:18 (and compare verse 10, “For the LORD has poured out upon you the spirit of a coma, and has closed your eyes: the prophets, even your heads the seers, has He covered over”; also the entire section 28:9-29:24), and even in accord with the general principle, “For the Lord GOD will not do anything without having revealed His secret to His servants the prophets,” of Amos 3:7; and he is the latter-day Zerubbabel, whose name means “scattered in Babylon,” symbolized by the bowl of Zechariah 4, who appears at the time of awakening and receives the tradition of the two prophets of Munster symbolized by the golden oil of the two olive trees, whose deeds are reckoned as the small things and laying down of a foundation of an introductory phase, and renders of Babylon, the “great mountain,” a plain, bringing forth the headstone of the Temple out of her, but not by might and power alone, even the body of the Lord, as in John 2:18-22, which represents His other earthly body, the poor of all lands, upon whose heart is to be engraven the fullness of the holy Gospel, as in Zechariah 3:9 and Jeremiah 31:31-34, hitherto silent in oppression down all the ages but now to receive the abundance of grace, and passes on the holy tradition to the two highly significant collectivities symbolized by the two lampholders, and as per Revelation 1:12, 13, 20; 2:1, 5, themselves the same two prophets, only now at their reviving (though the figure of a lampholder had represented from the beginning the operation in all the world of the Lord’s Holy Spirit, and latterly through the prophet Moses, seventh from Abraham, and as in Exodus 6:16-20, the Gospel being the revelation of the inner veiled essence and interior light of the ancient Law, looked forward to by the seven days of the Creation), which are, and as discussed at length elsewhere, the American and German peoples; and the latter is the table set up on the north side of the Tabernacle (Exodus 40:17-33), for “You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies” (Psalm 23:5), that is, in the midst of
7
my enemies in the edges of the North, and even as the Ark is found in the far west and is America, the place of revelation in these last days, for “the eyes of the LORD, they run to and fro through all the earth” (Zechariah 4:10), and there in the West is the rod of Aaron that budded (Numbers 17:1-11) and the flask of manna (Exodus 16:33-34), even the scepter of the prophet-king and the Christian corporative theocracy, both firmly grounded in and arising out of a supernaturalistic ideology, and a table is a figure for sustenance, and on this table are twelve loaves (Leviticus 24:5-9), and there is on this table “pure frankincense,” whose literal rendering is “pure whiteness”; for see how as one enters the realm and upon the path of holiness he finds himself first within the camp of Israel, which is a figure for the ancient peasant social order — religionist, communalistic, democratic — and the pre-existent universal peasant Faith, called today animistic, and ultimately within the Tabernacle precincts at its heart, which is the Mosaic revelation, and he proceeds from the gateway of the court to the altar of sacrifice, which is the revelation of God in Christ, and from there to the laver and its base, the latter being the Protestant Reformation, but the former this current final purification of doctrine and overthrow of the universal composite antichrist altogether, which is the second beast, which is the false prophet, with all its deeds and bitter fruit, from which, now himself fully sanctified as was Aaron, he enters the Tabernacle, still moving west, which is the state of full redemption, and finds himself within a three-fold enclosure, being the frame, the tent, and the covering of the tent (for the less substantial linen and goats’ hair layers are seemingly not focused upon in Exodus 40:19, though the full count of five must, of course, represent the Pentateuch), facing a triune medium of divine communication, even a voice proceeding forth from between two cherubim (Exodus 25:22; Numbers 7:89; I Samuel 4:4; II Samuel 6:2; II Kings 19:15; I Chronicles 13:6; Psalm 80:1; 99:1; Isaiah 37:16); and the three layers comprising the Tabernacle represent as well the three components of the ancient peasant order to be restored now worldwide, as the elements in the far west do the three components of the Christian corporative theocracy, being the communalistic order established for the American lower class in its entirety, the parallel elitist order characterized by computer-based full rationalization of industry, and the concentration of all state authority in the person of the prophet-king, true Zerubbabel, whose rule is legitimized solely by the will of Heaven and whose person is the equivalent of and interchangeable with the concept of the state, and even as the Scripture witnesses, saying in Proverbs 28:2, “Through the trespass of a land its princes become many, but through an understanding knowing man, so shall He restore it,” and then in Ecclesiastes 8:4, “Where the word of a king is, there is power, for who may say to him, ‘What are you doing?’ ” and as all this is dilated upon elsewhere — and even as the original form of the New Testament is witnessed to in the Greek tongue by thousands of ancient manuscript copies, seeing how the Gospel message for these last days cannot be understood without constant precise and often lengthy reference to the Old Testament, only that the insights revealed in the New Testament permit one to break through to the inner otherwise unknowable light hidden within it. But of the challenge of theological Judaism we need only ask: 1) If the Old Testament alone contains the truth from God, where is that vast host of Israelites and Judeans, lineal descendants of the people of both the Northern and Southern kingdoms for whose sake alone the Israelite Scripture was given, among whom, as per Ezekiel 47:21-23, a few converts of Gentile origin might be found for the greater glory of the chosen ethnics, demanded by Old Testament eschatology? 2) Why did the titanic struggle and utter devastation prophesied in words of such hate and fury to overwhelm ancient Babylon fail to materialize, and to the extent that she was occupied peacefully by Cyrus’ forces and survived for a further three-quarters of a milennium, and even as the book of Revelation calls this matter most forcefully to our notice? 3) Where are the prophetic and even if perforce veiled condemnations of that most massive phenomenon of post-Old Testament history, namely Christianity, that the Old Testament must surely be filled with if the New Testament is a work of false prophecy and lies, Satanic in origin and guiding toward idolatry, for what could be more degrading than for a new religion to arrogate the entire Israelite Scripture to itself and then survive and prosper for millennia, at first within only one continent but latterly within three, while “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 2:9) wait and wait for a land not their own and not their fathers’ hardly the size of one of the islands of the Christians — and yet the Old Testament prophets, though they clearly knew the future in great detail, are silent as regards this most basic issue? And truly the New Testament Christological references were in essence intended to serve three functions, being: 1) to drive the Jew away from the Faith; 2) to point a finger at Old Testament sections of great and especial import for the world elect; and 3) to distract the attention of the Roman officials from these sections and in particular from the class war aspect of Isaiah 52:13-53:12 by generating an artificial and highly visible dialogue between the first Christians and the Jews focusing on precisely these sections in such a manner as to obscure their social import. And this Bible is alone our wisdom and understanding in the sight of all mankind, and even as the prophet testifies, having just exploded the materialistic world view from within, in Ecclesiastes 12:9-12, “And further, being that the Preacher was wise, he continued to teach the people knowledge; and giving ear and searching out, so he composed many proverbs. The Preacher sought to find words of value, and found that what is written is straight, even words of truth. The words of the wise are truly as goads, but as well-driven-in nails are the words of those who have mastered the compilations given by the One Shepherd. But of more than is taught by these, my son, beware: of making many books there is no end, and much study is a weariness of the flesh.”
8
— Barry I. Hyman
CHRISTIAN REVOLUTIONARY BROTHERHOOD
MATTHEW 5:17-20
17 Do not think that I have come to nullify the Law or the Prophets: I have not come to nullify them but to fulfill them.
18 For Amen do I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away not the smallest letter, not a part of a letter, will drop out of the Law until everything written has come to pass.
19 Whoever therefore will nullify one of these “least” commandments and teach men so will be called “least” in the Kingdom of the Heavens; but whoever will perform them and teach them, that one will be called “great” in the Kingdom of the Heavens. 20 For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not even enter the Kingdom of the Heavens.
In truth a powerful but generalized impulse from His Spirit reached the New Testament authors before Revelation, the only inspired book ever dictated word for word, was given as it had those of the Old Testament, even as the Scripture witnesses in I Corinthians 13:8-13, “Love will have no end. But whether there are prophecies, they will be done away with; or tongues, they will cease; or knowledge, it will be done away with; because we know partially and we prophesy partially. When that which is perfect comes, however, that which is partial will be done away with. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I did away with childish things. For now we see things enigmatically through a looking glass; but then face to face. I know now partially; but then I will know fully, just as I am fully known. So there remain faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love”; and as this issue is analyzed at some length elsewhere, and so they quoted or paraphrased the Septuagint, which was the recension of the Old Testament known to Greek speakers, and they writing in Greek to fulfill Isaiah 28:11-12, “For through foreign speech and another tongue will He speak to this people, to whom He shall say, ‘This is the rest through which you may cause the weary one to rest, and this is the respite,’ but they will have no desire to listen,” and so that the completed Scripture would be multilingual as a sign that its message is not intended only for some particular nation or language or culture and that indeed no one of these can claim preeminence over any other, though it is Hebrew, the language of nearly four-fifths of the Scripture, and it came spontaneously to Adam and cannot be other than the speech of the gods and the speech of angels — Amen! Hallelujah! (surely He came with the flesh of Heaven into this world which is His dream) — a purely Biblical tongue and with the now imminent final vengeance against the Judaic the tongue of no modern group — truly this so-called Jew has shown in Palestine the truth of every last single “canard” of the most rabid “anti-Semitism”: behold, O world, the Jew! — being rather that of the eastern portion of the Central African forest belt called Eden, “region of delight,” where the Garden and Adam were, even by the headwaters of the Nile and the Uele-Ubangi-Zaire — and surely the color of the African alone is similar to that of “the dust of the ground” from which the man was formed, the reference to the Tigris and the Euphrates serving merely to universalize certain elements of the narrative; and see in Genesis 10:7 how there was a Cushitic Havilah — whose people and speech the holy family brought with them from the presence of the Lord out of Africa to Nod, the land of wandering, even Arabia to the east of Eden — this of course while other groups were also moving into the region from the north, these of the great Indus Valley civilization that built no temples, Arpachshad, “Harappa the destroyed,” the latter portion of whose name evidently survived as Kesed (Chaldea) in the wilderness area back of Ur, and Shelah, “the sent forth one,” also mighty long-necked giants of the seed of Anak, “the long-necked one,” from the shores of the Baltic (and the first Greek speakers c. 2000 B.C. came also from the Baltic region, and so the language of the New Testament represents the first form of Northern speech ever committed to writing — and the mantle of the ancient Germanic is borne by the modern German, as established elsewhere), and so the mixed-race or Arabic stock including ultimately the children of Israel arose, as in 6:1-3, whose emergence, though not the violence of the rulers of in particular Mesopotamia of the day, of whom the Scripture says in Jude 6, “And as for those rulers who kept no rule over themselves — but they certainly have left their estates behind them! He keeps them in eternal bonds under gloom for the judgment of the great day”; and read “rulers” in II Peter 2:4 as well; and see Psalm 49:11 and 73:18-19; reminded the Lord of the coming of the prophet Moses who was to take a Nubian wife, as in Numbers 12 (and compare Deuteronomy 24:8-9; also Leviticus 13:1-46; and see how the leprosy spoken of in the Scripture was no random occurrence, but a supernaturally induced chastisement for racist feeling, the offenders being stricken in accord with the predominant conceit of the racists of Israel, who sought identification with those of white skin and thin yellow hair and despised the African — but truly the Scripture says in Isaiah 18:7 speaking of the black man in America and his role in our liberation of ancestral homelands program, as discussed elsewhere, “At that time an offering will be brought to the LORD of hosts from a people scattered and become plunder, and from a people whose history has been fearful from of old, a nation meted out and trodden under foot, who were taken as spoil down the rivers of their land, to the place of the Name of the LORD of hosts, the mount of Zion,” and
we certainly must affirm as a theological construct and aspect of dogma that the Afro-American is no longer in regard to
1
essential nature as of the Hamitic stock at all, but rather entirely of the Japhetic, and perhaps even, in response to a subliminal “sighting” of the parameters of the British mind and the climate of North America under the conditions of extreme psychic trauma of past times, on the basis of genetic modification, so that he represents in evolutionary terms a new emergence in inward if, due to the effects of narcotics and the despondency-fury syndrome in which their appeal is rooted, itself the child of white scorn and rejection and the insidious two-faced maneuverings of the Judaic, however veiled conformity with the European rather than the African norm), and He said, “My Spirit will not have to strive against man forever, for that one will also be of flesh: and his days will be 120 years,” where “be of flesh” has the sense of our “have human feelings”; and compare Deuteronomy 34:7; and surely the appearance of a world-nationality formed by the amalgamation and blending of the peoples and ethnic stocks through intermarriage, the only form of mankind capable of being produced by human action, is manifestly both the sign of the ultimate flowering and the fruit of peace and love; and the Scripture testifies in Isaiah 49:12, “Behold, these will come from far off; and behold, these from the north and from the west; and these from the land of China” — though its original purity was ultimately lost save only among the Israelites, and truly its script and not the Phoenician is the parent form of all phonetic scripts that exist in the world, and even the Devanagari of Sanskrit descends from it, and it was the Lord’s gift to Cain, city-builder and father of civilizers, for see how “the LORD gave the alphabet to Cain as assurance that none who found him would smite him” in Genesis 4:15, that will serve as the holy and pure vehicle for world linguistic unification, and as per Zephaniah 3:9, “For I will give the peoples a pure language then, that they might all call on the Name of the LORD and serve Him in perfect unity” — and with Hebrew as the common speech of all mankind the full rigor of Old Testament law, though it is not incumbent in an absolute or ultimate sense and the ancients were forced to remove themselves far from it, will surely nonetheless return, and as per Matthew 5:17-20 and 28:18-20; and compare Ephesians 3:8; Acts 9:15-16; I Corinthians 9:16-17; II Corinthians 12:7; also the panegyric to the Law which is the 119th Psalm; and even circumcision is a shadow of His blessed reality, and sacrifice and offering on altars of earth: for we were grafted in, but the chosen ethnics were cast off and driven from the world, and then we were alone the remnant of Israel and the sole surviving vestige of the people of the Jews; and in truth, “it pleases the LORD for the sake of His righteousness, that He magnify the Law and aggrandize it,” as in Isaiah 42:21 (but see how first forms have precedence in all things, as per Matthew 19:8 and Mark 10:5-6, and how we are to search for underlying principles, as per Mark 2:27-28; and the appearance of the God among us in the person of the blessed Jesus as a type and figure of the world’s poor in the hands of the children of the evil one foretold, though in cryptic manner, in Zechariah 11:4-17, does illustrate this supremacy of first forms, for note the lower class focus of the section, and how, having referred symbolically to the cutting off of Saul and his two wicked sons Abinadab and Malchishua, the king and the kingdom the Lord had not wanted but had grudgingly consented to, at the perhaps month-long campaign culminating in Israelite defeat at Mount Gilboa, the great slaughter among the host, as in I Samuel 31:2, 5-6, the supplantation by the Philistines, who had come from beyond the sea to establish a coastal enclave, of the Israelites of the distant Jezreel Valley-Jordan River salient, type of the alien and usurping Judaics in modern Palestine, as in verse 7 — and note the two-tiered nature of Philistine society, that is, the thoroughly Canaanized but ethnically European, as is now known, ruling Cretan, as the Scripture says conformable to this in Genesis 10:14, “and (being of the same place the Philistines went forth from) the Cretans,” and the subservient true Canaanite, and as per Zephaniah 2:5, strata, likeness of the ethnically European Khazar and the Semitic, though also non-Jewish, Sephardic elements of the hosts of the oppressor, and the name of their king of Gath in the days of Saul and David, Achish son of Maoch, as in I Samuel 27:2, meaning “Certainly this is a person,” son of “the Oppressed,” being so much in accord with the Ever-Wronged-Perpetual-Victim image cultivated ad nauseam by the Judaic — and the following civil war between the house of David and the house of Saul when David was king in Hebron, but then the building of the Solomonic Temple, yet one more step after the institution of monarchy on the path of civilization and away from the barbarian life of earlier and better days, and an expensive one and one involving great exactions and grinding of the face of the poor — and see even see in I Kings 10:14 and II Chronicles 9:13 how it was 666 talents of gold that came to Solomon in one year — but with such features as cannot be applied to this project, seemingly approved of, but as before grudgingly, by the Lord, alone, as the Scripture says here, “thirty pieces of silver,” this being the price of a gored slave, as per Exodus 21:32, and then, “throw it at the molder,” and then mockingly, “a majestic price it was that I was evaluated at by them,” all this followed, and even causally, by the North-South division of the kingdom, true likeness of the fruit of the bitterness engendered by Herod the Great, and then an event clearly future from Zechariah's time, which can be none other than the reign of this same wicked Herod who rebuilt the existing Second Temple lavishly and at great cost and in whose days the Lord appeared among us as a peasant, was bought and sold for the price of a gored slave, and as He had said above, but now in accordance with the fullness of its meaning, “a majestic price it was that I was evaluated at by them,” and so became a type in all respects of the fate of the children of His true Kingdom in the hands of the wealthy and the rulers of the lands — and Himself a peasant turned insurgent in the Middle East of His other world — only leaving us over the guidance of His self-validating Scripture and the gift of His Holy Spirit; and here is Jeroboam the son of Nebat and the son of a widow woman, a laborer, who fled to Egypt and returned, whom my Lord incited to rebellion through His prophet Ahijah the Shilonte and the
distinctive garment that was upon him, of whom no evil is spoken until he is established in his kingdom, a figure of Christ and a figure of antichrist, and even as is Joseph, as shown to be so elsewhere; and there is a wait of three days, and a day can represent a century, as in Revelation 2:10; 11:9 and 11, as discussed also elsewhere, and this wait would bring us to the reign of Constantine the Great, king of Rome, and the legitimization by the Roman state of that form of Christianity, being the Roman Catholic, patently prefigured by the heretical and idolatrous distortion of the Mosaic faith sponsored by Jeroboam at the
2
time of his fall, for an “Oral Law”-“oral tradition” that he had devised out of his own heart, he and his counsellors, clearly lay behind the inversion of the sense of the Pentateuchal golden calf narrative, his veneration of images, modification of Pentateuchal ceremonial elements, illegitimate building of shrines on high places, reminiscent of the cathedrals — surely He spurns the temples made by hands — and the institution of a new priesthood in violation of the Lord’s express will; and there was in this latter period none good in the whole house of Jeroboam except for one child, who was taken away before his time, and of whom the prophet Ahijah testified that “some good thing” was found in him, and this child must surely represent Protestantism as classically constituted and, although all names in the Jeroboam narrative, being I Kings 11:26-14:20; 15:25-32, are resplendent with symbolic import, yet this child’s name is among them, being Abijah, which is “the Lord is my father,” which can be understood as implying “my father alone,” that is, to the exclusion of the “little father” or Pope and the Catholic clergy as a whole, and as per Christ’s own commandment and true sign of Matthew 23:9; and Nadab, meaning “liberal,” represents an altered latter-day form of Catholicism of short duration, which traipses about through the lands and so at last comes to its end; and Ahijah the Shilonite had said that the kingdom would under any circumstances ultimately return to the house of David, and the prophet who came from Judah said that Jeroboam’s heresy would be undone by Josiah king of Judah to be born, and both prophecies were fulfilled through Josiah, who expanded Judean sovereignty to include the waste and desolate North, and who as a king of the house of David surely represents the first form of this context, which is the Mosaic Law; but as Jeroboam was clearly appointed by the Lord and through His prophet, true figure of John the Baptist, Josiah, whose name means “established” or “founded by the Lord,” represents the undoing of the universal composite antichrist in its entirety through the agency of the restored true church of these last days of Babylon’s world rule, and partly through her accepting and emphasizing the first form of this our present context, which is this same Mosaic Law; and see further from Leviticus 10 and the stonings of the Law, as also the typology of both Leviticus 16 and the placement of the Tabernacle furnishings — may he who reads this understand — with what clarity and flawlessness, lacking all distortion, the prophet verbalized each and every legislative element; and the Scripture witnesses in Psalm 19:8, “the commandments of the LORD are clear, causing the eyes to light up”), for although the artificial dichotomy between an old and a new Law established through the antinomianism of Paul was a truly essential factor in permitting the flame of truth to spring from wick to wick and even as was the very employment of the Greek tongue, yet it is in the last analysis to be equated with the seemingly ethnic focus of the Old Testament latter-day prophecies, and as discussed elsewhere, and so all has become as a fiery serpent that holds its tail in its mouth, for the culmination and capstone of the divine process and the coursing of the mystic river whose streams bear joy for the believers and the city of our God is the entering of all the world’s people and that to the fullest extent into Israelite nationality, though “our citizenship is in Heaven,” as in Philipians 3:20, and the core ethnic element has fallen out in its entirety ages past, even as the acquisition and conception of American nationality of this time (though we state quite openly that the only further immigration required for the performance of the American world role, and as discussed at some length elsewhere, is Haitian, now that the Lord, intending to further the cause of Hebrew, has already gathered a multitude of Hispanics to this land, that we might cull from the hearts of those who love us the forgotten ways and mind-set of Africa, truly past even Jerusalem the mother of us all, fulfilling thereby the word of the prophet, “From beyond the rivers of Nubia my suppliants, even the daughter of My dispersed, will bring My offering,” as in Zephaniah 3:10, we who cannot forget the millions whose blood the earth itself refuses to cover, who died in battle and in famine houses and slaughter pits and in sudden belching infernos opening out under British and Soviet planes, and there was a war-hymn in that day in the mouth of all that no one paid the least heed to but our Lord, and it was “We are Biafrans fighting for survival — by the Name of Jesus we shall conquer!”) which may be likened to nothing but the religionist conversion experience in all the wide range of human ken; and compare Deuteronomy 29:29; and see how James presupposes the application of the divine Law to the Christian (and the nature of the prophecies of James, extending as they do to the end of all time, establishes plainly that it is ourselves, all of us — that is, the poor — who are in truth these “twelve tribes which are scattered abroad” of James 1:1), “the whole Law” (2:10), “the perfect Law that gives freedom” (1:25; and see also 2:12), in his discussion of faith and works (1:16-17, 25; 2:8-25; 4:11-12; and compare Malachi 3:6, “For I, the LORD, do not change: and shall you children of Jacob not be consumed?” and in truth He is this Jesus Christ whom we preach, “the same yesterday, today, and forever,” of Hebrews 13:8), even as he emphasizes Leviticus 19:18 and the commandments governing interpersonal relations; and truly “the Law of the LORD is perfect, restoring the spirit” (Psalm 19:7); for how important it is to keep the entire Law, says James, and not to offend in even one particular, and it is Leviticus 19:18 that is under discussion, through which the royal Law, the Law of the King of Heaven and earth (2:8), gives freedom; and he condemns speaking evil of the Law or judging the Law by breaking it, but counsels that we are rather to keep it, and that there is only one Lawgiver, and we are not fellow lawgivers along with Him (4:11-12) — then blessed be His glorious Name forever, and blessed be the remembrance of His perfect Law; and the book of
Malachi with which the Old Testament closes, having just prophesied the destruction through fire of the Soviet state and the extermination of the residual world Marxist collectivity to follow in 2:17 and 3:13-4:3, concludes by referring again to the coming of John the Baptist, “the messenger of the covenant,” whose coming followed by that of the Lord had been prophesied above in 3:1-6, saying that all who are called by the name Israel are to remember and perform the Law of Moses with its statutes and judgments, and the Scripture here connects the adjuration regarding the Law to not only John’s coming but the time of eschatological vengeance, “the coming of the great and fearful day of the LORD,” as well; and the blessed Jesus came after John and did Himself counsel us to keep this same Law with these very statutes and judgments that He had Himself given
3
and did Himself punctiliously observe the whole time He walked among us — He is Lord of all — through His prophet Moses; and how blessed even now “are the undefiled in the Way, who walk in the Law of the LORD” (Psalm 119:1); and these live most fully and in essence within the narratives and the whole life of the Bible, which is the window looking out on the Hidden World and the abode of truth and joy, from which they sally forth as agents of Heaven, as though to destroy the Judaic out of Palestine or the Marxist from the ends of the earth, to reconnoiter or to strike in this exterior lower world; and so the Scripture says in Proverbs 18:10, “The Name of the LORD is a tower of strength: the righteous one runs into it and is inaccessible”; and there is in the Bible scattered throughout both the Old and New Testaments the greatest poetry the world has ever seen, as we of the English literary tradition well may judge, though of a type reminiscent of Beowulf and other works of the ancient North, whose beauty and power are retained even in translation, being extrinsic to the precise phraseology in the original tongue; and see how true and faithful are the words of the prophet David in Psalm 119:174, “I have longed for Your salvation, O LORD, and Your Law is my delight”; and that we are Israelites, as though by fleshly descent, and the ancients are reckoned as our fathers, all of them, is plain, for see Romans 9:10; I Corinthians 10:1; James 2:21; and I Peter 3:6; and compare Romans 1:13; 11:13; and I Corinthians 12:2; and a pure and holy form of nationalism, Hebrew in thought and speech, Christian as it is Mosaic, will surely sprout forth among us in that day, handmaiden to the supernatural, one that will despise “all who wear foreign garb” (Zephaniah 1:8) among the people, but yet one that could never act in accord with the false and evil secular nationalistic zeal of Saul, as the Scripture testifies, “Now the Gibeonites were not of the children of Israel, but of the remnant of the Amorites, and the children of Israel had sworn to them; but Saul had sought to slay them in his zeal for the children of Israel and Judah” (II Samuel 21:2); and see how Paul, witnessing to men of Europe, even those of Corinth, reminds them not of the Jewish but specifically the Arabic, that is mixed-race, appearance and origin of the blessed Jesus, for first he says, “If anyone does not love the Lord, let him be accursed,” and that in Greek, but then “Marana tha!” “Come, O our Lord!” not in Greek and not in Hebrew, but rather in Aramaic, the Semitic lingua franca of that time (I Corinthians 16:22; and compare 12:2); and even as he wrote to the Romans, “You stand only through the Faith. Do not become highminded, but rather be in fear: for if God did not spare the natural branches, how is it possible for Him to fail not to spare you?” (Romans 11:20-21; and see 11:13; also 1:13); so that the same fate precisely that overtook the ancient Jews now awaits an apostate Europe — save only the Germans, and as discussed at length elsewhere, they of perseverance and fanatical determination, given to mysticism, ever predictable and without guile — and even as the Lord said through His prophet Amos, “You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will visit all your iniquities upon you” (Amos 3:2); and truly He confounded their language, as the language of Babylon, for their heresy, though today that seems mild, proto-antichrist turned antichrist, likeness of the ziggurat, and He still remembers their most ancient sins and when He died among them — truly He came down from Heaven to the earth to see them in their evil — and will surely yet scatter them abroad, a few here, a few there, upon the face of all the earth, for now they are worthy (Genesis 11:1-9; and compare 9:1 and 1:28; also 15:16, and further Revelation 9:20-21); and the many instances of that well-nigh inexplicable stiff-necked rebelliousness that crowd the pages of the Pentateuch, the initial and foundational unit of Scripture, cannot but indicate to the impartial reader that its divine Author is here preparing him for a later episode in which He will sever His connection with fleshly Israel, and to such an extent that His statement in anger to Moses, “And now let Me be, that My anger might burn against them and consume them; and I will make of you a great nation” of Exodus 32:10, and as paralleled in Deuteronomy 9:14, “Let Me be, that I might destroy them and blot out their name from under heaven; and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they,” and then repeated in Numbers 14:12, “I will smite them with the pestilence and disinherit them, and I will make of you a nation greater and mightier than they” (and there in 14:21 He said, “But truly as I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the LORD”; and compare Psalm 72:19, and even as this entire psalm is applied elsewhere to the Christian corporative theocracy and the person of the Lord’s king destined to supplant our manifestly counterproductive individualistic-Enlightenment state form), must be viewed simply as a revelation of His ultimate purpose with regard to the peculiar chosens and the passing of the divine guidance from them to a far wider group through the conduit of a small remnant element destined itself for loss of ethnicity through intermarriage, for “these are the ones who were not defiled with women, for they have not known sex” (Revelation 14:4; and see how “the son of the foreigner who has joined himself to the LORD” is compared to the eunuch in Isaiah 56:1-9, for “he of a strange people,” if male but neither Edomite before the days of Edomite treachery nor Egyptian, could “never enter the congregation of the LORD forever,” as per Deuteronomy 23:2-8, and compare the sole further appearance of this underlying Hebrew word in Zechariah 9:6), with the main group first disinherited and then driven from the world (truly the prophet Moses, though received into glory having left his body, even the community grounded in the fullness of truth of his Law, under the rule of Michael and prohibited forever to the devil, as in Jude 9 and Zechariah 3:1-2, was denied entrance to the promised land and died at its border in the wilderness only as a sign of the fate of fleshly Israel, that it was to be consumed and pass from the world and never return out of exile again; and even as the entire desert narrative prefigures this — the giving of the holy Law, the sin and casting off of the people, their wandering long and hard years, as in Deuteronomy 2:15, awaiting an appointed death, and the inheritance by a successor group of the divine blessings and promises; and see the character of the first sons of Jacob as displayed in their dealings with their brother Joseph, that it is of a piece with that of the Israelites of all ages, as both the Law and the Prophets no less than the Gospel bear witness, so that we see plainly how a nation was raised up characterized by an innate depravity, though often neutralized by the witness of open miracles, chosen to be jettisonable at a time of universalization to come; and note as well how all significant Israelite firsts are rejected, and these are seven firsts, so that the
4
concept of ultimate rejection is connected from the beginning and in essence with the name of fleshly Israel, for the firstborn son of Abraham is rejected, as is the firstborn son of Isaac, and then Reuben, firtborn son of Jacob, is rejected for Joseph, whose firstborn, Manasseh, is rejected, and Joseph is rejected from rulership in favor of Benjamin in the person of Saul, who is himself rejected for a man of Judah, and Judah too is well-nigh rejected and never rules over the North again); and the prophet’s first wife Zipporah displayed a progressivist-elitist bent of mind in regard to the circumcision (Exodus 4:24-26), and is a manifest figure of “Christian” Europe — and Moses divorced her but received her back again for the sake of Jethro her father, true figure of Germany, and his own two sons by her (Exodus 18) — but his Nubian second wife, a manifest figure of the peasant lands and the collectivity of the world elect, was well-pleasing in every way to both the prophet and the Lord, who defended her honor both through word and deed, for the orientation of the Lord Himself has always been entirely toward the life-bearing doctrine destined to liberate the entire household of the children of His Kingdom even as from the dead and the power of the grave (Romans 11:15; Ezekiel 37:1-14), and not at all toward intermediary communities through whose agency the holy seed and leaven were strewn abroad from Palestine to every region under heaven; and our Lord compares Himself to the prophet Jonah in Matthew 12:39, saying, “An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and no sign will be given to it but the sign of the prophet Jonah”; and his name means “dove”: and even as the Holy Spirit descended in bodily form as a dove upon Jesus, as per Luke 3:22, so is Jonah a figure for the Lord Himself who descended from Heaven in bodily form among us; and the prophet Jonah was from Gath-hepher (II Kings 14:25), which occupied the same small Galilean hill as the later Nazareth, and he went down from there to Joppa, and Peter son of Jonah was called from Joppa to bring the light of Christ to the Gentiles (Acts 10:30-33), and he boards a ship and moves west across the Sea, intending to land at Tarshish, which is Spain, as did Paul (Romans 15:24, 28), but is met by the fierce Euraquilo (Acts 27:14), and converts on the ship men the likeness of men of the West and says (Jonah 2:8), “Those who regard lying vanities will forsake their perversions,” and Euraquilo means “South-east, north,” and the first part is in Greek and the second in Latin, and the storm from out of Arabia destroyed Greek Christendom and the so-called Enlightenment then decimated Europe; and he is thrown as though to his death in the West, but escapes through a miracle and lives to witness with great success among the people of the East, people of the Third World, and even as the book of Jonah ends, saying in 4:11, “And as for Myself, should I not have pity on Nineveh, that great city, in which are more than twelve multitudes of people who cannot distinguish between their right and left hands, and also much cattle?” which can only mean, “See how receptive these people are, though I never before this sent them prophets, and they cause Me no trouble like the twelve tribes of your people. And even their cattle cause Me no trouble, but your people are a seed of evildoers and hostile to all men — and woe betide the non-Jew who falls under their power!” (but yet the book of Job, the Bible’s sole and exclusive work of theological disputation, all of whose participants were Gentile, must represent typologically the dialogue to arise between the Old and New Testaments and the Koran, with Job representing the perfect Law under chastisement and disrepute though without flaw, his three friends who, though essentially positive, condemn him without knowledge, but are rendered acceptable to God through Job’s mediation, both Job and Eliphaz, chiefest and master of the group of three, being rendered, further, prophets at the end, though the divine word had come to both earlier, as may be seen from Job 4:12-21 and 6:10, and even as his own captivity is returned only when he prays for these his friends, the New Testament and historic Christianity, and the negative and even hostile Elihu, whose name means “God is He” and is numerically equivalent to Ahmad, Muhammad’s original name, having the value of 53, the text of the Koran; and this is the “twice, three times” of Job 33:29 of Elihu’s discourse, Old Testament, New Testament, Koran, and the reason for the “a messenger with him, an interpreter, one among a thousand” element of verse 23, God having already spoken once, then twice, but man remaining unaware, as in verse 14, prefiguring, though Elihu himself was unaware, the Islamic position of the distant future; but see the succession of true prophets prefigured by the vision of the ladder of Genesis 28:10-13 where angels, the same word in both Hebrew and Greek as for messengers, ascend and descend between Heaven and earth for Jacob, followed by the standing of the Lord Himself, that is to say, in incarnate form, by him at the end; and a new succession of Christ as God incarnate oriented prophets was to be sent again, Jacob now representing the Lord’s other earthly body, that is, His elect, as per John 1:47-51; and the Lord appeared to Job in incarnate form as well in Job 40:1-5 between His two addresses to him from the whirlwind, for he says thereafter in 42:5, “I heard You by the hearing of the ear; but now my eye has seen You”; and being a true prophet, he speaks in 19:25-27 of Jesus, and as a type of all Old Testament Christology; but Elihu, though there is reflected good in his words culled from his knowledge of the divine Law, is utterly ignored and bypassed at the time of reconciliation; and see from any map of Arabia showing the ancient place-names how the invader of Isaiah 21:11-17 is to sweep northward from the interior, overwhelming Dedan, Tema, Dumah, Seir, which is Edom, and then presumably Palestine, the locale of the prophet, in rapid succession; and the Scripture witnesses in verse 12, saying, “the morning comes, and also the night,” and the morning is the revelation of the Gospel, and the night is this Islam to arise south of Dedan; and what an amazing and befitting thing it is, how our Scripture alone in all the world confesses and emphasizes the self-evident relevancy of supernatural proof from beginning to end, that is, from the commissioning of Moses to the highly complex and largely already fulfilled, as established in detail elsewhere, prophecies of the book of Revelation; and let it not be forgotten that the teachers of Muhammad were Judaics, drawn to Judaism through the conversion of the Yemenite royal house of Himyar, called today Sephardics, and not true Jews of the Biblical people, as is slanderously reported, and even as those of European blood descend from the early Medieval Khazars of the Ukraine) and the Scripture witnesses plainly in regard to the ministry of the prophet Moses in Deuteronomy 34:5-12, “So Moses the servant of the LORD died there in the land of Moab according to the
5
word of the LORD. And He buried him in the valley in the land of Moab that faces Beth Peor so that no man would know the location of his grave until that day. And Moses was 120 years old at his death; his vision had not weakened and his vigor had not left him. And the children of Israel are to weep for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days; then are the days of weeping and mourning for Moses to be at an end. And Joshua the son of Nun has become filled with the Spirit of wisdom, because Moses placed his hands on him; the children of Israel are to hearken to him therefore: so are they to do, even as the LORD commanded Moses. And a prophet like Moses whom the LORD knew face to face will not arise again in Israel, according to all the signs and the wonders that the LORD sent him to perform in the land of Egypt against Pharaoh and against all his servants and against his entire land, and according to all the mighty hand and according to all the great terror that Moses displayed in the sight of all Israel”; and see 31:24; also 32:39; and then further in 33:2-5, “The LORD came from Sinai and flashed forth from Seir for them; He shone forth from the mountains of Paran, and came for the myriad disciples of holiness; from His right hand went a decree of fire for them: Certainly He loves the peoples — all His holy ones will be in your hand; and they will sit themselves down at your feet, each one of them receiving of your words and saying, ‘Moses commanded the Law for us, even the heritage of the congregation of Jacob: for he became king among the Upright when the heads of that people and the tribes of Israel gathered themselves to him’ ”; and even as the ultimate universalization of the Law was prefigured at the very beginning of the Wilderness period in Exodus 15:22-27 at the encampments of Marah and Elim, meaning “Bitterness” and “Great Trees,” respectively, for the twelve founts and seventy palm trees of the latter site must surely represent the twelve tribes of Israel and the seventy nations of the Biblical region of Genesis 10, which latter may be seen to represent all nations in Deuteronomy 32:7-9, so that the water of the founts gives life to the trees and therefore represents divine revelation given to all mankind through the medium of ancient Israel; and thus the waters of Marah were first bitter, symbolizing the initial ethnic focus of the Biblical revelation, but are sweetened by the casting into them of a tree, symbolizing the Gentiles, that is, the universalization of the Law through Christ, also His very cross, called “tree” in, for instance, Acts 5:30; at which point, that is, in Exodus 15:26, where the future calling and healing of the Gentiles is surely implied as well, the Israelites are warned severely of the fruits of disobedience; and compare the 19th Psalm, noting how the sun there is a figure of the Law and how it was to proceed forth from ancient Palestine to all the extremities of the world; also the 111th Psalm, only that “the heritage of the heathen” is great Babylon at her fall; and even as “the high places of the earth” of Isaiah 58:13-14, “If you cause your feet to return home because of the Sabbath, not acting in accord with your desires on My holy day, and if you call the Sabbath a delight and the holy day of the LORD honorable, and will honor Him by not acting in accord with your own ways, or seeking the fulfillment of your own desires, or even speaking on it so much as a word of them; then you will find delight in the LORD, and I will cause you to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed you with the heritage of Jacob your father: for the mouth of the LORD has spoken it”; and the very process of the creation of the world served to foreshadow and introduce the Saturday Sabbath (Genesis 2:1-3; Exodus 20:8-11; 31:12-17; and also 16:23, 29 and 35:3); and see the palm fronds of Tabernacles in the hands of the redeemed, as per Revelation 7:9, knowing that the branches of John 12:13 were for spreading out on the road; and compare Leviticus 23:40; and even in accord with the fullness of meaning implicit in the phrase "the song of Moses the servant of God and the song of the Lamb” of Revelation 15:3; and one verse says, “he will think to change times and laws” (Daniel 7:25), and a second, “Here is the root of the perseverance of the saints, who keep the commandments of God and the Faith of Jesus” (Revelation 14:12); and compare Isaiah 66:17; and see further how the 144,000 Jewish Christians (Revelation 7:1-8; 14:1-5 — note how the list of tribes is defective, for Dan is not mentioned, and is thus symbolic of fleshly Israel as actually constituted during the New Testament age, that is almost entirely of descendants of the old-time Southern Kingdom, but comparable spiritually to the Danites when the graven image of Micah was set up among them, as in Judges 18:30-31, and destined like them to pass from the world) of whom it is said that “falsehood was not found in their mouth, for they are without flaw” and “It is these who follow the Lamb wherever He might go” are praised above all men for full comprehension of the import of the new teaching; but truly they were distinct from other Christians only in regard to their zeal for the divine Law (Acts 21:20; 22:12; and compare Matthew 24:20), so that we must affirm that the inner veiled essence of Paul's antinomian assertions finds its proper application in these last days only in reference to his own words (surely just as
the Lord gave true prophecy to Balaam, but he remained in his evil and is called a diviner still at his death in Joshua 13:22, so did Paul, inquisitor and tyrant, though made the Lord’s true prophet, yet remain forever in his reprobate state, a rat forced to eat itself, over the edge, falling toward the fire) — but the Masoretic, which is surely to be identified with the real Jews of ancient times rather than the spurious variety of the modern Synagogue of Satan, though the latter has fastened itself securely to it as though to bring it into disrepute and drag it down to oblivion, being a manifestly superior form of text on the basis of overall character, sequence of material, internal consistency, lack of artificial elements and that aura of unreality observable at times in the Septuagint as in the Apochrypha, and one preserved among a peasant people conversant with its language and one of zeal to whom the oracles had been first entrusted, coupled with the evident fulfillment of its form of the predictive content of the Old Testament during the course of subsequent history as all may plainly see, must be adjudged the original and may in truth be compared to a living man, but the Septuagint to a clay image (Luke 4:16-22; Romans 10:2; 3:2); and we must affirm that the original text has been preserved unchanged or virtually so in one of the existing forms and that one surely in Hebrew [but the mystic significance adhering to the precise wording and spelling of that almost four-fifths of the Bible given in the holy language or its script is in truth the seal of the great King affirming that the entire Old Testament has truly been preserved in an absolutely flawless letter-perfect state; and “it is easier for the heaven and the earth to pass away than for one
6
part of a letter to fall out of the Law,” as per Luke 16:17; and see Matthew 5:18; and compare Revelation 13:18 and as analyzed elsewhere; and further, the very essence and life-force of all which exists in the world is borne by its name in the speech of the gods, for word-formation precedes image-formation, as is known, in the thought of all who use speech; and compare Revelation 9:11; but yet see how the entire Scripture lives, as per Acts 7:38; Hebrews 4:12; and I Peter 1:23; and that it is the very divine life that is truly in it, as it is an emanation of His blessed will and essence given through His Holy Spirit, very much comparable as such to His appearance here in and as Christ (John 1:18; II Corinthians 3:17)] — and the Old Testament Israelites were clearly literate to a degree unparalleled in the ancient world, for in regard to one taken at random by Gideon the Scripture witnesses in Judges 8:14, “And he captured a young man of the men of Succoth and questioned him; and he wrote down the names of the princes of Succoth and its elders for him, seventy-seven men”; and compare Isaiah 10:19; and this is only in accord with what had been enjoined previously in Deuteronomy 6:6-9 through Moses, “And these words that I am commanding you this day are to be in your heart. And teach them diligently to your children and speak of them when you sit in your house and when you go in the road and when you lie down and when you rise up. And bind them together for a sign in your hand that they might be held at eye level for recitation. And copy them out within your gates by the doorposts of your house”; and the holy book subsequently expanded in length, for “Joshua wrote these words in the book of the Law of God,” as in Joshua 24:26; and compare Isaiah 34:16; John 10:34; 12:34; 15:25; Romans 3:9-19; and I Corinthians 14:21; and truly the Spirit has always guided the chosen community, first Israelite and then Christian, in the acceptance of divinely given units of Scripture and the rejection of all that is spurious, and even in accord with the witness of Ezekiel 13:9, “And My hand will be against the prophets who see vanity and who divine lies: their words will not appear within the source of counsel of My people, for they will not be written in the Scripture of the house of Israel; neither will they themselves enter the land of Israel; and then you will know that I am the Lord GOD,” so that the Bible expands in this world only after the type of that primordial form of its text, canon and wording, to be found in Heaven spoken of by the angel in Daniel 10:21, “But I will declare to you that which is inscribed in the Scripture of truth”; and see how the Pentateuch through its structure — introduction, main body, inspired commentary — looks forward to and validates the completed Scripture — Law, Prophets, Gospel — and in particular its view of the New Testament as in essence an inspired commentary on all that came before; but yet the first two divisions more readily divide from Deuteronomy than from each other, prefiguring together the Old Testament; and as Genesis and Deuteronomy are comparatively short within the Law, each being one of five, so are the Law and the New Testament within the Bible; and there truly were forty years between the standing of Israel by mount Sinai and the giving of the book of Deuteronomy only as a sign of the coming of a four hundred-year-long intertestamental age, this extending from c.358 B.C., the last year of Artaxerxes II Mnemon king of Persia, the probable date of the sending of the text of Malachi through the agency of the translated Elijah to us from Heaven, and as discussed elsewhere, perhaps during the governorship of Nehemiah’s successor, the likely Persian Bagohi, as per Malachi 1:8 and the Elephantine Papyri, and 41 A.D., or thereabouts, following traditional indications as to the date of the writing of Matthew, viewed since ancient times as the first gospel; and grosser forms of heresy were to be banished from the hearts of the men of the intertestamental age through the cessation of prophecy and the attendant longing for its reemergence and consequent great turning toward and acquisition by or strengthening of a traditionalist aura of the written words of former prophets, as per Amos 8:11-14, and so it was then, and even as it came to be during the course of the full generation, likeness of that earlier age, that is from c.65 A.D. to 98, that elapsed between the giving of the last of all other New Testament books and that of the book of Revelation, the perfection of knowledge and prophecy; and see further how it was to be restored yet again through the prophets John of Leyden and Bernard of Munster, as discussed at length elsewhere, as per Revelation 10:11-11:14, also the announcer-prophets of Zwickau, likeness of John the Baptist, and then in the giving by one in the form of a nuclear explosion of that booklet of 10:1-10, sealed up and hidden from men, though John heard it recited verbatim and it entered fully into his being, until the seventh angel would be about to sound his trumpet, which is even the latter-day, post-Christian, ages of darkness “eyes” element of Isaiah 29:18 (and compare verse 10, “For the LORD has poured out upon you the spirit of a coma, and has closed your eyes: the prophets, even your heads the seers, has He covered over”; also the entire section 28:9-29:24), and even in accord with the general principle, “For the Lord GOD will not do anything without having revealed His secret to His servants the prophets,” of Amos 3:7; and he is the latter-day Zerubbabel, whose name means “scattered in Babylon,” symbolized by the bowl of Zechariah 4, who appears at the time of awakening and receives the tradition of the two prophets of Munster symbolized by the golden oil of the two olive trees, whose deeds are reckoned as the small things and laying down of a foundation of an introductory phase, and renders of Babylon, the “great mountain,” a plain, bringing forth the headstone of the Temple out of her, but not by might and power alone, even the body of the Lord, as in John 2:18-22, which represents His other earthly body, the poor of all lands, upon whose heart is to be engraven the fullness of the holy Gospel, as in Zechariah 3:9 and Jeremiah 31:31-34, hitherto silent in oppression down all the ages but now to receive the abundance of grace, and passes on the holy tradition to the two highly significant collectivities symbolized by the two lampholders, and as per Revelation 1:12, 13, 20; 2:1, 5, themselves the same two prophets, only now at their reviving (though the figure of a lampholder had represented from the beginning the operation in all the world of the Lord’s Holy Spirit, and latterly through the prophet Moses, seventh from Abraham, and as in Exodus 6:16-20, the Gospel being the revelation of the inner veiled essence and interior light of the ancient Law, looked forward to by the seven days of the Creation), which are, and as discussed at length elsewhere, the American and German peoples; and the latter is the table set up on the north side of the Tabernacle (Exodus 40:17-33), for “You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies” (Psalm 23:5), that is, in the midst of
7
my enemies in the edges of the North, and even as the Ark is found in the far west and is America, the place of revelation in these last days, for “the eyes of the LORD, they run to and fro through all the earth” (Zechariah 4:10), and there in the West is the rod of Aaron that budded (Numbers 17:1-11) and the flask of manna (Exodus 16:33-34), even the scepter of the prophet-king and the Christian corporative theocracy, both firmly grounded in and arising out of a supernaturalistic ideology, and a table is a figure for sustenance, and on this table are twelve loaves (Leviticus 24:5-9), and there is on this table “pure frankincense,” whose literal rendering is “pure whiteness”; for see how as one enters the realm and upon the path of holiness he finds himself first within the camp of Israel, which is a figure for the ancient peasant social order — religionist, communalistic, democratic — and the pre-existent universal peasant Faith, called today animistic, and ultimately within the Tabernacle precincts at its heart, which is the Mosaic revelation, and he proceeds from the gateway of the court to the altar of sacrifice, which is the revelation of God in Christ, and from there to the laver and its base, the latter being the Protestant Reformation, but the former this current final purification of doctrine and overthrow of the universal composite antichrist altogether, which is the second beast, which is the false prophet, with all its deeds and bitter fruit, from which, now himself fully sanctified as was Aaron, he enters the Tabernacle, still moving west, which is the state of full redemption, and finds himself within a three-fold enclosure, being the frame, the tent, and the covering of the tent (for the less substantial linen and goats’ hair layers are seemingly not focused upon in Exodus 40:19, though the full count of five must, of course, represent the Pentateuch), facing a triune medium of divine communication, even a voice proceeding forth from between two cherubim (Exodus 25:22; Numbers 7:89; I Samuel 4:4; II Samuel 6:2; II Kings 19:15; I Chronicles 13:6; Psalm 80:1; 99:1; Isaiah 37:16); and the three layers comprising the Tabernacle represent as well the three components of the ancient peasant order to be restored now worldwide, as the elements in the far west do the three components of the Christian corporative theocracy, being the communalistic order established for the American lower class in its entirety, the parallel elitist order characterized by computer-based full rationalization of industry, and the concentration of all state authority in the person of the prophet-king, true Zerubbabel, whose rule is legitimized solely by the will of Heaven and whose person is the equivalent of and interchangeable with the concept of the state, and even as the Scripture witnesses, saying in Proverbs 28:2, “Through the trespass of a land its princes become many, but through an understanding knowing man, so shall He restore it,” and then in Ecclesiastes 8:4, “Where the word of a king is, there is power, for who may say to him, ‘What are you doing?’ ” and as all this is dilated upon elsewhere — and even as the original form of the New Testament is witnessed to in the Greek tongue by thousands of ancient manuscript copies, seeing how the Gospel message for these last days cannot be understood without constant precise and often lengthy reference to the Old Testament, only that the insights revealed in the New Testament permit one to break through to the inner otherwise unknowable light hidden within it. But of the challenge of theological Judaism we need only ask: 1) If the Old Testament alone contains the truth from God, where is that vast host of Israelites and Judeans, lineal descendants of the people of both the Northern and Southern kingdoms for whose sake alone the Israelite Scripture was given, among whom, as per Ezekiel 47:21-23, a few converts of Gentile origin might be found for the greater glory of the chosen ethnics, demanded by Old Testament eschatology? 2) Why did the titanic struggle and utter devastation prophesied in words of such hate and fury to overwhelm ancient Babylon fail to materialize, and to the extent that she was occupied peacefully by Cyrus’ forces and survived for a further three-quarters of a milennium, and even as the book of Revelation calls this matter most forcefully to our notice? 3) Where are the prophetic and even if perforce veiled condemnations of that most massive phenomenon of post-Old Testament history, namely Christianity, that the Old Testament must surely be filled with if the New Testament is a work of false prophecy and lies, Satanic in origin and guiding toward idolatry, for what could be more degrading than for a new religion to arrogate the entire Israelite Scripture to itself and then survive and prosper for millennia, at first within only one continent but latterly within three, while “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are the Synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 2:9) wait and wait for a land not their own and not their fathers’ hardly the size of one of the islands of the Christians — and yet the Old Testament prophets, though they clearly knew the future in great detail, are silent as regards this most basic issue? And truly the New Testament Christological references were in essence intended to serve three functions, being: 1) to drive the Jew away from the Faith; 2) to point a finger at Old Testament sections of great and especial import for the world elect; and 3) to distract the attention of the Roman officials from these sections and in particular from the class war aspect of Isaiah 52:13-53:12 by generating an artificial and highly visible dialogue between the first Christians and the Jews focusing on precisely these sections in such a manner as to obscure their social import. And this Bible is alone our wisdom and understanding in the sight of all mankind, and even as the prophet testifies, having just exploded the materialistic world view from within, in Ecclesiastes 12:9-12, “And further, being that the Preacher was wise, he continued to teach the people knowledge; and giving ear and searching out, so he composed many proverbs. The Preacher sought to find words of value, and found that what is written is straight, even words of truth. The words of the wise are truly as goads, but as well-driven-in nails are the words of those who have mastered the compilations given by the One Shepherd. But of more than is taught by these, my son, beware: of making many books there is no end, and much study is a weariness of the flesh.”
8
— Barry I. Hyman
CHRISTIAN REVOLUTIONARY BROTHERHOOD